Skip to main content

Post 22: Peer Review

Peer reviews can be extremely helpful or very disappointing. Some advantages are that you are able to get helpful criticism on your paper and be given pointers on things you would have never noticed or thought there was anything wrong with it. Another advantage is that who ever is doing the peer review can check your grammar behind you just in case you looked over something. But with almost everything there are disadvantages. Sometimes instead of giving actual criticism who ever is doing the review will only right compliments and sometimes they are so blatant you can tell they did not read the paper. Another mix of a disadvantage and an advantage is that the peer reviewer could tell you your whole paper that you spent all night working on is horrible and needs a redo which crushes your soul but the bright side is that you'll get a chance to redo it before it's graded.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post 2: L. Lennie Irvin's 7 Myths of Academic Writing: Is It The Truth?

Are these myths bias or are they true? In Irvin's essay, "What Is “Academic” Writing?" he outlined and debunked 7 myths that most high school and college students were made to believe as they evolved as writers. The Myths Are: Myth #1: The “Paint by Numbers” myth  Myth #2: Writers only start writing when they have everything figured out  Myth #3: Perfect first drafts  Myth #4: Some got it; I don’t—the genius fallacy Myth #5: Good grammar is good writing Myth #6: The Five Paragraph Essay Myth #7: Never use “I”  Most of these myth's I have personally never heard of but I just can't agree with myth #1. The myth is described as "writers believe they must perform certain steps in a particular order to write “correctly.” Rather than being a lock-step linear process,-". Maybe it's just me being stubborn but I've always been taught to follow an evidence triangle or some type of layout when I wrote essays and it made it a little more easier an...
1 comment
Read more

Post 11: Understanding Math

Imagine yourself sitting down in your math class getting ready for this big test. You read all of your formulas and looked over the problems that you did in class. You get your test and then BOOM you don't remember anything. How can you prevent this? You have to actually practice. According to Paul Dawkins, a math professor at Lamar University, " You cannot learn mathematics by just going to class and watching the instructor lecture and work problems.  In order to learn mathematics you must be actively involved in the learning process.  You’ve got to attend class and pay attention while in class.  You’ve got to take a good set of notes.  You’ve got to work homework problems, even if the instructor doesn’t assign any.  You’ve got to study on a regular schedule, not just the night before exams.  In other words you need to be involved in the learning process."(Dawkins) This is a true statement since I've had the opportunity to test it myself on my last math ...
1 comment
Read more

Post 12: Confusion with MLA Style

MLA Style is one of the most commonly used writing and citing method among scholars. It's easy enough to use when it comes to formatting the paper but I always have trouble with using the MLA citation. Since it is changed every few years I often get the versions of the citations mixed up and I write it all out of order. For example when I was doing the MLA citations for my essay instead of putting the authors/publishers first I put them at the end instead and so now it's wrong.
1 comment
Read more