Skip to main content

Post 18: Does Cloud Tweaks fit the blogging genre?

Does Cloud Tweak's posts fit the criteria to be in the blogging genre? Yes, because according to Dirk's essay "-when something new happens that requires a response, someone must create that first response. Then when that situation happens again, another person uses the first response as a basis for the second, and eventually everyone who encounters this situation is basing his/her response on the previous ones,resulting in the creation of a new genre. (251)" The posts on Cloud Tweaks are either their opinion on another's opinion or them just stating their opinion on an controversial topic in the technological world. For example in the post  "Will Artificial Intelligence Impact Jobs." Leindwand not only uses compare and contrast but he is also using and basing some of his responses on the opinions of others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post 2: L. Lennie Irvin's 7 Myths of Academic Writing: Is It The Truth?

Are these myths bias or are they true? In Irvin's essay, "What Is “Academic” Writing?" he outlined and debunked 7 myths that most high school and college students were made to believe as they evolved as writers. The Myths Are: Myth #1: The “Paint by Numbers” myth  Myth #2: Writers only start writing when they have everything figured out  Myth #3: Perfect first drafts  Myth #4: Some got it; I don’t—the genius fallacy Myth #5: Good grammar is good writing Myth #6: The Five Paragraph Essay Myth #7: Never use “I”  Most of these myth's I have personally never heard of but I just can't agree with myth #1. The myth is described as "writers believe they must perform certain steps in a particular order to write “correctly.” Rather than being a lock-step linear process,-". Maybe it's just me being stubborn but I've always been taught to follow an evidence triangle or some type of layout when I wrote essays and it made it a little more easier an...
1 comment
Read more

Post 25: Did the Peer Review Process help me?

The peer review process was a big help to me. I have always been taught to take constructive criticism as a blessing even if I don't agree with what they have told me. It allowed me to get a view of how others received my paper and if it was effective or not. Sometimes I would get comments telling me that I had them hooked the entire time and that I had a good paper but other times I would get comments telling me to change 'this', add a comma, get rid of this sentence, or that I had a weak argument and vocabulary. Honestly it made me feel good when people would tell me those things because they aren't telling me these things to hurt me but to help me. Telling me that my paper is good is not constructive and won't help. peer reviews also gave me a chance to see how others write and to use their writing styles to improve my own. Seeing the mistakes or the flow of the other students papers allowed me to make out the do's and don'ts for my own paper.
3 comments
Read more

Post 23: Remake of my Post 3

Building Your Online Image       Have you ever thought about how much information you post about yourself on the internet? You reveal parts of yourself through pictures, text posts, and tagged photos whether you realize that or not.  The way you display your self online can have both a positive and negative effect on your image. Anyone can put your name in the google search bar and find out what they want about you. According to Nathan Chandler, a 10 year expert in consumer tech, "People who initially find you on the Internet have only that content by which to judge you."(1) Your future employer or customers would have access to see all your posts whether the post are good or bad and make biased assumptions of you before they have even gotten the chance to meet you in the real world. You could lose your job opportunity and some money. Chandler also mentions that if you are to be a professional at anything that you do, never post anything negative. Keep your p...
3 comments
Read more