Of course Stedman follows his own convention! He would be a hypocrite and a bad writer if he did not. Armadillo Roadkill is one of the annoyances that Stedman listed and it's defined as putting in a quote without first introducing it. How he follows this is when he is doing an example of Uncle Barry and His Encyclopedia of Useless Information. In the example he states "Addressing this issue, David M. Potter comments, “Whether Seward meant this literally or not, it was in fact a singularly accurate forecast for territorial Kansas” (199). (248)" He introduces the quote with "Adressing this issue" and stating his sources name.
Are these myths bias or are they true? In Irvin's essay, "What Is “Academic” Writing?" he outlined and debunked 7 myths that most high school and college students were made to believe as they evolved as writers. The Myths Are: Myth #1: The “Paint by Numbers” myth Myth #2: Writers only start writing when they have everything figured out Myth #3: Perfect first drafts Myth #4: Some got it; I don’t—the genius fallacy Myth #5: Good grammar is good writing Myth #6: The Five Paragraph Essay Myth #7: Never use “I” Most of these myth's I have personally never heard of but I just can't agree with myth #1. The myth is described as "writers believe they must perform certain steps in a particular order to write “correctly.” Rather than being a lock-step linear process,-". Maybe it's just me being stubborn but I've always been taught to follow an evidence triangle or some type of layout when I wrote essays and it made it a little more easier an...
Good job with citing his work, Brooklynn!
ReplyDeleteGreat post! I agree with you that Stedman follow his own convenction and he's a great writer.
ReplyDelete